Skip to content
Spool & Slice

Compare

PLA versus ABS

This was the original filament decision and it has largely been overtaken. In almost every case where someone is weighing PLA against ABS, the right answer is a third material.

How this page is funded. Buy links go to Amazon and we earn a commission on qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you. Commission never decides an order or a score, we accept no free products or sponsored placements, and every roundup names something to skip. Full disclosure.

The picks, ranked

The picks, ranked
#ProductBest forScorePrice
1
Spools of PLA filament stacked on a workshop shelf (illustrative photograph of the product type)SUNLU PLA+A toughened PLA answers the impact complaint that used to send people to ABS.Toughened PLA+ grade
The PLA side, improved9.0/10Check price on Amazon#ad disclosure
2
A partly used spool of translucent filament beside a 3D printer (illustrative photograph of the product type)Overture PETGMost of ABS's practical advantages on an open printer, which is why this comparison has faded.215-270 C, no enclosure
What usually replaces both8.8/10Check price on Amazon#ad disclosure
3
A functional 3D printed part in a dark engineering filament (illustrative photograph of the product type)Polymaker PolyLite ASAThe material to spend an enclosure on. ABS keeps only acetone smoothing over it.UV and chemical resistance
If you have an enclosure8.9/10Check price on Amazon#ad disclosure
4
A functional 3D printed part in a dark engineering filament (illustrative photograph of the product type)Polymaker PolyLite ABSWorth it for acetone vapor smoothing and legacy designs. Outside those, ASA does the job better.230-255 C, enclosure recommendedSkip this
A narrow remaining case6.4/10Check price on Amazon#ad disclosure

Live prices verified September 1, 2026. Scores are our own fit rating for the stated use, not a measurement and not a customer rating.

Two printed test parts photographed together
Two printed test parts photographed together.
Published printing parameters by material, from Prusa Research's filament material guide.
MaterialNozzle (C)Bed (C)EnclosureNoted for
PLA185-23550-60NoLow warping
PETG215-27070-90NoImpact resistance
PETG HT270110NoTemperature resistance
ABS230-25595-110RecommendedImpact resistance
ASA220-27590-110RecommendedUV and chemical resistance
PC270-275100-115RecommendedHigh tenacity, temperature resistance
PA (nylon)240-28570-115RecommendedMechanical parts
Flex / TPU220-26040-85NoFlexible or bendable
PP220-24570-100NoLow warping
HIPS225-255100-110NoDissolvable
PVA / BVOH195-21560NoSoluble support
Composites (CF / GF)225-29040-120VariesHardened nozzle required
Published printing parameters by material, from Prusa Research's filament material guide. Ranges are the manufacturer's published envelopes, not a recommendation for your specific spool — every brand publishes its own narrower window inside these. Figures from Prusa Research, retrieved 2026-09-01.

Why this comparison used to matter

For years these were the two filaments. PLA was easy and weak, ABS was difficult and tough, and every printed part was a choice between them. Most of the internet's 3D printing advice was written in that era and a lot of it is still circulating.

Two things changed. PETG arrived and gave most of ABS's practical toughness with none of its printing requirements. And ASA became widely available, doing everything ABS does plus surviving sunlight.

The differences, for completeness

Where ABS still wins

Acetone vapor smoothing. ABS dissolves in acetone, which produces a sealed glossy surface no other common material can reach without sanding. If that finish is what you want, ABS is the material and there is no substitute.

Beyond that: existing designs that specify it, and processes built around it. Both are real but neither is a reason to start with ABS today.

PLA also got better

The PLA in that historic comparison was plain PLA. Toughened PLA+ grades are noticeably less brittle on impact at the same price, which removes the most common reason people went to ABS in the first place.

They do not raise heat resistance — that remains PLA's hard limit, and it is why heat is the one case where PLA genuinely cannot be patched. The plus is explained on PLA versus PLA+.

The decision, restated

  1. Easy, cheap, indoor, static: PLA.
  2. Gets handled or dropped: PETG, or a toughened PLA first.
  3. Gets hot or lives outdoors: ASA if you have an enclosure, PETG if you do not.
  4. Needs acetone smoothing: ABS.

Every pick, in detail

01

SUNLU PLA+

SUNLU

The PLA side, improved · 9.0/10 our fit score

Spools of PLA filament stacked on a workshop shelf (illustrative photograph of the product type)

Illustrative photo of the product type, not this exact item.

The cheapest filament we would load without flinching, and the reason most people never need to spend more.

Published specifications for SUNLU PLA+
Diameter1.75 mm, published tolerance +/- 0.02 mm
Spool weight1 kg
Nozzle185-235 C (PLA range) Prusa Research
Drying50 C / 7 h (PLA guidance) Overture

What it does well

  • Consistently the lowest cost per kilogram among brands that publish a tolerance figure
  • The PLA+ formulation is noticeably less brittle than plain PLA on thin parts
  • Stocked widely enough that a reorder rarely means a different formulation

What it does not

  • Color-to-color variation is real; a temperature that works for black may not work for white
  • "PLA+" is a marketing term, not a standard — nothing about it is defined across brands
02

Overture PETG

Overture

What usually replaces both · 8.8/10 our fit score

A partly used spool of translucent filament beside a 3D printer (illustrative photograph of the product type)

Illustrative photo of the product type, not this exact item.

The PETG most people should start with: forgiving on temperature, widely stocked, and cheap enough to learn on.

Published specifications for Overture PETG
Diameter1.75 mm, published tolerance +/- 0.02 mm
Nozzle215-270 C (PETG range) Prusa Research
Bed70-90 C Prusa Research
Drying65 C / 7 h Overture

What it does well

  • Overture publish an explicit drying temperature and time for their own PETG
  • Tolerant of a wide temperature window, which matters because PETG punishes a bad guess with stringing

What it does not

  • Strings more than the premium spools at the same settings
  • Bonds hard to smooth PEI — Prusa's PETG page says "Do not print on the smooth PEI sheet as the adhesion may be too strong"
03

Polymaker PolyLite ASA

Polymaker

If you have an enclosure · 8.9/10 our fit score

A functional 3D printed part in a dark engineering filament (illustrative photograph of the product type)

Illustrative photo of the product type, not this exact item.

The right answer for a part that lives outside. It is ABS that does not go yellow and chalky in sunlight.

Published specifications for Polymaker PolyLite ASA
Nozzle220-275 C (ASA range) Prusa Research
Bed90-110 C Prusa Research
Temperature resistanceUp to about 93 C Prusa Research
EnclosureRecommended Prusa Research

What it does well

  • UV resistance is the entire point and it is real — Prusa contrast it directly with ABS, whose outdoor parts "turn yellowish and more brittle over time"
  • Warps less and smells less than ABS at the same temperatures

What it does not

  • Needs an enclosure and a hot bed; this is not a material for an open printer in a cold room
  • More expensive per kilogram than the PETG that would do the job for many outdoor parts
04

Polymaker PolyLite ABS

PolymakerSkip this

A narrow remaining case · 6.4/10 our fit score

A functional 3D printed part in a dark engineering filament (illustrative photograph of the product type)

Illustrative photo of the product type, not this exact item.

ABS worth printing only if you already have an enclosure and ventilation. Without both, buy ASA or PETG instead.

Published specifications for Polymaker PolyLite ABS
Nozzle230-255 C (ABS range) Prusa Research
Bed95-110 C Prusa Research
EnclosureRecommended Prusa Research
ShrinkageAbout 1-2% after cooling Prusa Research

What it does well

  • Acetone smoothable, which no other common material on this site is
  • High heat resistance for the price

What it does not

  • Prusa's ABS page lists "potentially dangerous fumes (styrene)" and calls a well-ventilated room important
  • Significant warping; large flat parts are a fight without a heated chamber

Common questions

Is ABS better than PLA?

Tougher and more heat tolerant, harder to print, and it needs an enclosure and ventilation. For most people PETG delivers the practical advantages of ABS without the requirements.

Should I still use ABS?

For acetone vapor smoothing, yes. For legacy designs that specify it, yes. Otherwise ASA does what ABS does and also survives sunlight, for the same printing requirements.

Does PLA+ close the gap to ABS?

On impact, meaningfully. On heat, not at all — a PLA+ part sags at the same temperature a PLA part does. Heat is the one PLA limitation that no grade fixes.

Sources

Scooter M. · Enthusiast

I'm Scooter, an enthusiast who's genuinely into this. I read the manuals, compile the published specs, and do the math. No lab coat.

About · How we choose · Last reviewed